Manchin states he does not support D.C. statehood expense, dealing advocates a significant blow – The Washington Post

30April 2021

By Meagan Flynn,

J. Scott Applewhite AP

Sen. Joe Manchin III informed press reporters in his house state of West Virginia on Friday early morning that he does not support the bill to make D.C. the nation's 51st state, according to audio provided by the Democrat's office and a report from WVNews.

Manchin, a key swing vote in the closely divided Senate, said he believes a constitutional change, instead of legislation, would be required to confess D.C. as a state. His stance deals a significant blow to statehood advocates who were hoping for his support after the bill passed your house recently.

Manchin cited findings from the Justice Department under Presidents Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter and comments from then-Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy in reaching his decision.

“They all pertained to the same conclusion: If Congress wishes to make D.C. a state, it must propose a constitutional modification. It should propose a constitutional modification and let individuals of America vote,” Manchin stated in a radio interview with Hoppy Kercheval of West Virginia's MetroNews, the complete audio of which was provided to The Washington Post by Manchin's personnel.

[_blank” data-xslt=”_http” href=””>Sen. Tim Scott's discuss race fire up an intense dispute]

Manchin was among four in the Senate Democratic caucus who had yet to reveal their positions on statehood; all the other Democratic senators have stated they support the idea, but Republicans have actually been vocally opposed. (One Democrat, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, co-sponsored a statehood bill in the last Congress however has actually not signed on as a co-sponsor this year.)

The Washington, D.C. Admission Act passed the House 216 to 208 last week, along rigorous party lines, for the 2nd time in history. Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has said that “we will attempt to work a course to get [statehood] done.”

Fenit Nirappil

The Washington Post

The expense faces high obstacles because chamber, with or without Manchin. Because of the Senate filibuster, 60 senators would need to support statehood for the expense to advance– making passage all but impossible as long as the filibuster is in place.

Sen. Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.), the sponsor of the Senate statehood expense, said in a current interview that he was taking things one step at a time, focusing first on gaining the support of all Democratic senators.

Now that appears unlikely.

Carper spokesman Campbell Wallace said the senator was not offered to comment Friday however said in a declaration that Carper “stays actively engaged with colleagues on both sides of the aisle and is confident this can reach the finish line by the end of this Congress.”

In a call with reporters that was separate from the radio interview, Manchin stated he had not completely established his opinion prior to the House voted recently to pass the bill. After that, he stated, he and his staff did a “deep dive” on the problem.

He stated in the radio interview that he saw the 23rd Amendment as a chief barrier for D.C. statehood, echoing arguments from congressional Republicans who have actually called D.C. statehood unconstitutional. The 23rd Amendment, validated in 1961, provided D.C. three electoral votes in governmental elections.

[_blank” data-xslt=”_http” href=””>Will D.C. become a state? Discussing the difficulties to statehood.]

Manchin stated that Congress had the opportunity to contemplate statehood then however did not enter that instructions.

“It makes complex D.C.'s path to statehood since Congress had three options to select from,” Manchin said. “They could have selected statehood back then, retrocession to Maryland. or we can approve electoral votes.”

“They selected to give 3 electoral votes, which is the exact same as any small state. That's where it ought to be,” he continued. To those who want to change the District's status, he stated, “Let individuals of America vote.”

Manchin also cautioned “all of my good friends” that if they go down the course of seeking statehood by basic legislation, “you understand it's going to go to the Supreme Court.”

“Every single legal scholar has told us that,” he stated. “So why not do it the proper way and let individuals vote, to see if they wish to alter?”

Asked whether Manchin supports D.C. statehood in concept, a spokesperson said he did not have anything more to include.

Democrats who support statehood say the Constitution does not prevent D.C. from ending up being a state. They have framed the dispute as a racial-justice and civil liberties concern, stating it is immoral to deny the city's homeowners voting representation in Congress and the chance to fully govern their own affairs.

Stasha Rhodes, campaign director of 51 for 51, noted Friday that every state admitted to the union, consisting of West Virginia, was admitted by Congress. She argued it should not be different for D.C.

“No member of the Senate need to deny ballot rights to 700,000 mostly Black and Brown Washingtonians based upon a flimsy understanding of the Constitution and American history,” she stated in a declaration.

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), the District's nonvoting delegate and sponsor of your house statehood bill, pushed back on Manchin's issues over the 23rd Amendment in an interview.

She kept in mind that her expense requires an expedited resolution looking for repeal of the 23rd Amendment while also right away rescinding the modification's allowing clause.

“There are several ways to deal with the 23rd Amendment,” Norton said. “We recognize it as a challenge however absolutely nothing like an absolute obstacle.”

She included that Manchin's position did not shock her and that “I was never relying on him” to push the costs across the finish line.

“I am counting, however, on getting more Democrats elected so that he does not have the type of power he now has, by the way, not only over D.C. statehood however over much of the president's program,” Norton said.

Read more:

Sen. Tim Scott's talk about race spark a fiery argument

How fears of ‘Negro domination' kept D.C. citizens disenfranchised for years

D.C. statehood moves from political fringe to center of Democratic agenda

© The Washington Post Company

Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W. Va.) at the Capitol on Thursday.

A windowless room in the D.C. federal government structure in 2018 ended up being the war room for Mayor Muriel E. Bowser's statehood project.


Our Score
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upgrade Your Listing

Add images, video, and more details to your listing! More information means more clicks. More clicks means more quotes!

Free listing includes: business name, address, phone, website, google map

Upgraded listing includes: business name, address, phone, website, EMAIL ADDRESS, COMPANY LOGO, VIDEO, IMAGE SLIDE SHOW, FEATURED LISTING PLACEMENT